to
reconstruct memories or unbuild trauma where others are provoking violence; a
man babbling such science unbeknownst at something made arbitrary; those pitted
anxieties those remarkable delusions where it becomes quite easy; to see
resentment to realize its nature for no other purpose; in diagnoses, it can
never be us, it must always be the subject; this seems too easy, it banishes
fallibility, but it must be quite comforting; as not for provocation, or some
underwater frustration, but simply to suggest a richer perspective; such
becomes crazy, when a person has an affliction, where all issues are filtered
through unsaid affliction; it is escapist, it undermines reality, but it
becomes a favorite go-to.
I
ponder normality—as to ask a question: Must normality consist of (all)
positive traits?
the
answer
is quite instinctive for we see negativities where many of them are normal; for
example, to become defensive or to lie these are unfortunate but they are
normal behaviors—depending upon a given situation.
I
am searching for one deeper this dynamic between psychologist/patient—where intimacy,
albeit, surface promulgation, it must remain imbalanced; we might sense
deception as normal, if but to focus the patient, if but to make a
breakthrough; but something intricate is taking place, where repeated behavior
becomes the go-to while intentionality must be cognizant.
this
is
however
normal
behavior.
we review our encounters,
where lying might be good, while too much lying becomes pathological,
even psychopathic; indeed, something negative is deemed essential as in
necessary and even considered normal; upon a false foundation something critical
emerges where good results enforces a deceptive practice; something
truer: if a patient realizes deception, it does not fall upon the psychologist,
but rather, it is seen as a negative in the patient, which is considered unnormal—in
some cases, psychopathic. I will not depute it here, maybe in an upcoming
debate, but if something is designed, we insist, that it must be even.
those artists paint with
ease, they strengthen with a slant, they have an inner portrait representing
normality. but many are debating with a few core rules where mechanics take precedence.
here, we are empathetic, considering something unsaid, while one insists on
room for deconstruction.
