so confused about relations or so infused
by admiration. our sundry needs our autumn leaves or desolate happiness. but
declining faith at radical claims while analyses becomes crucial. by critical
premises to dare assert our inability to isolate, or determine affections by
exclusivity. one becomes concerned. however, some are old-fashioned, some are
new-aged, where others are forgiving or daring. nonetheless, we dream about
rites or passion where tenderness is pure, plus, encryption. (this sounds
subversive, while it seems apropos, where two hide nothing, explore their
mental channels, while loving with acceptance of every tendency. (but one argues
about education, demanding the parameters make for exclusivity, where
statistics show an educated person is more likely to succumb to a tryst.) we’re
not speaking certainties. we’re debating feelings. while asserting a keen
assessment—most, or the majority of academicians, are postmodern pluralists.)
so, we need to filter humans: Does plurality determine an inability to love?
or, while this is anarchical, Are such people designed to be more caring or
loving, due to more freedom, or an ability to live more intentionally? we don’t
argue either side, while experience seems influential, where one is semi
indicting exclusivity. indeed, it’s safer, while we debate contraceptives, but
if used nothing poses a great threat. we think of children, what we want for
them, while it certainly isn’t plurality. in a way, we answer our times, we
dial our urges, or better, we look for a way to become human without the guilt made
by seclusion. our greater grandparents might laugh, they might chastise us,
while grandfather was a bit lose in his dealings. maybe exclusivity provides
closure, control, plus, a bit of a power feeling. maybe it releases more love
for it feels secure while it too nurtures self-respect. but what for deviance,
or what for animal likeness, or better, what for our indebtedness to each
other? it seems clear. honesty is so required. without the threat of losing a
person because of leftist perusals. but temperament, or openness to mutuality,
while most feel better with security.
