I seesaw between kindness or sullenness or
upbeat malaise. I disappear in conversation or return saying, “What was that?”
it seems inappropriate such friction to determine future hostility. so young at
this, so defensive with this, where two have built a fence like this. I have
said drama into something self-reflective while often we stir deep wounds: the regurgitation,
those flashbacks, where the motive is thought through. (but responses might
trouble, where one is logical, but it’s supposed to hurt more. this is problematic.
it’s a symbol. while some people require too much!) if it devastates those
things in us then it’s interesting. if it’s viewed with much rationality
something is out of place. (while so critical is this fact, when it comes to them,
we are licensed to speak as he does.) one needs more emotion, even if angry
dissention, while if it wasn’t there, it would not erupt. but something probes,
a crucial point, if one is passive does that necessity more abuse? the kid is
nice, so one slaps him, if he lashes out, is he guilty? we film our souls such dear discrimination
while it’s difficult to determine leniency. those cries screaming, the
countenance boxed off where one has assessed based upon insecurities. often, we find a situation, where contours
class, as that becomes a reason for assessments. it’s no longer facts, it’s
hunches, while feelings determine something is not right. or better, one seems
put together, by whatever means, but I need to authenticate that. so, something
simple, is made complex, where the passive one is now angry. but that is such by
motive, indeed, while a little anger is often helpful. if one is trained, it might flow well,
else, it becomes a resistant project—requiring caveats, as opposed to mere
(exclusive) behaviors, in a world demanding pure submission. one is aggressive, another is
passive-aggressive, but all behaviors must be by guessing or by intuition.
nothing is straight to senses as in pure clarity while we expect certain
responses. anything becomes
irritation. mere pleasantries carry undertones. while our spirits grimace upon
our egresses!
the project is by contention
the pantomime is disgruntle the puppeteer is vexed. we meet the rebellious
puppet. we take essence for granted. we undermine his need for mutual respect—
while distressed enough to cause intentional discomfort. but here is its
reality: it doesn’t matter if the puppet is upset; or if the puppet maintains
kindness; the goal is to unravel something that has trained itself. moreover,
the goal is to unlock that dynamic, in all its dysfunction, while, too, to
replace his thoughts concerning his addict mother—or addicts in general. if but
too controlling but never a controlling incident where a hunch might outweigh
actuality. I surmise with uncertainty, for one was quite presumptive, where
silent wounds reflect another person’s contempt. our homes, our childhoods,
they determine the respect we shall receive in the future. be it good or negative,
or some middle reality, or somewhat the deviant outcast. to hurt by intention.
to box one in. while lack of affection becomes his anomaly. but a given dynamic
or a teacher’s racism where this becomes a mirror. or a prison ground, suffused
with such behaviors, while one works hard to control his thoughts. or an asylum
where most are otherwise in such a way that he learns something intricate. to
then desire normality. or to shun normality. while still an above-average
socialite. in truth, something is peculiar, despite the behavior, any or
everything is problematic. such a reality, while one assesses that, they, too,
are subject to their observations.
how to exclude self-analyses, in an environment where one works so
closely with instability? if a
prisoner becomes his environment, this is said of every situation, despite, one’s
frustration with the facts. a Buddhologist
becomes a Buddhist, a meditator becomes a sage, while a psychiatrist becomes
everything it entails. it becomes an
old cliché, we become what we associate with, in an environment where
characteristics are being absorbed.
it’s escapable through removal. but most are not looking for change, but
mastery over the given principalities.
