the outline is tentative. the
spirit goes where it wills.
I misstated in forgetting that.
some are sure/sore advanced. even
in antiquity, spiritual talents became practical. free flowing water. baptism
as testimony. in saying that,
“It exists there also, I’m just
asserting it comes from here.” thus, multiple sources, many denominations.
the orphan finds Divinity. others
are watching. one turns in connection, praising accordingly. one would prefer
say, “It is God,” aside from saying, “It is the person at the church.” or
better, “It is both.”
the plight of the matter is separation.
the might of the matter is Romans. most will never see grander articulation
than what is located in the Septuagint/English translation. it becomes human
endeavor. it becomes interruption. it becomes community, a conglomerate. in
asking, Why? if the situation doesn’t change, is not a refusal nor a reprove of
the necessity. in saying, I can’t trust a person, is not the same as saying, I
can’t trust the power in that person.
it seems that as it was, with
powers generating, even a complex, it is now—more so—because religiosity is so
evolved by the components of science.
we put actions on the table—speaking
of self—subsumed by error, I stand in reproach.
in an assertion, founded in our
understanding of spiritual matters, each evolved character becomes a bulwark, a
buckler, a house, a discovered temple in Deuteronomy.
I am saying something apparent to
many people. I am asking, with what we have discovered, the sources being
multiplied, Is religion still viable—or do we opt out, concentrated on
community?
a better question is, speaking on
matters of occupation, If we engage what we know to be spiritual, is this religious,
because of the texture?
a person is conditioned at times to
believe, if I can do it on my own, I do not need assistance, nor an upper arc.
this runs in the face of humility, and stagnates, quite possibly, continued
growth.
to make it clear: If tangibility is
of more importance, would it be more feasible to worship the community, instead
of worshiping Invisibility.
many will cleave to Invisibility,
rightly so, many others will cleave to community. in my tentative state, I will
cleave to both.
in closing, scientific communities,
and religious communities, seem to work in the same direction, with both
seeming to merge at given points. we just see differing sources, at times, we
see exact similarities.
