one must be careful. I might not
mean it that way, but it’s received with irritation. how have two gotten closer,
where space is mandatory, while we advertise intimacy? the design irks at
turns, where we’re objective, discounting objectivity. or a person is cold, too
much in edifice, while I, too, am chilly. I can’t belabor it. it’ll be in sameness.
we change with interior understanding. but true in fact, we must respect the
message, we must hear where it’s coming from; like tigers or lions when
entertaining; if it misses the message, if it loses concentration, it might
become its nature.
I keep looking at a box.
reminiscing in time. sensing entrance into thoughts.
I keep hearing winds as in language
while I, too, am blowing winds.
one enjoys authenticity, even
confrontation, where honesty might be instructive. or walking in shadows,
pleased to be there, gleaning utensils, tools, construction.
I have tendencies indicative of all
people – like hearing something where it pushes a nerve; one realizes it and
begins to search inside, where a conclusion melds together – an opened eye, a
hunch, in search of clarity.
how do we differentiate the many
from the few – in a mind watching itself more than others – where this is by
design?
a meerkat is scavenging, curious,
watchful. a dugite is deceiving. the meerkat is eating scorpions. the dugite
needs to remove the meerkat from its meal. so, the dugite mimics a sound that
means danger to the meerkat. the meerkat hears it, to mistaken it for danger,
running and leaving its meal for the dugite to snatch up. of course, this gets
old. the meerkat sees what’s happening. and instead of hearing the mimicked voice
and running, the meerkat looks around for the supposed danger.
we might see something. something
familiar. or it might not account for much.
an inhome ferret wants attention.
the owner is busy. the ferret acts out, becoming demanding.
we might see something. something
indicative. while anything less is too meditated.
one becomes confrontable with
behaviors, genuine or false behaviors, one might need those behaviors to insist.
is this for us, you, or me? to explain: I am a certain way, another is comfortable
with my behavior, this turns into intimacy. must I always maintain that
behavior, in a changing world, while many assert – certain behaviors should
always remain? yes. but growth changes us. we must grow together. as what
worked earlier, may not work now. too daunting.
I see with a person there’s a
weakened point, where this is good. as long as affection is present, change is
good, unless I treat one as my property. so changing is good, if changing into
us, where behaviors are mostly similar – or they intensify in a positive
direction.
if one can see us, we get
uncomfortable, but this means there’s something to hide.
