In its indifference it has come to hurt
the lights as they fire the pain as it exhausts. We argue concerning postulates
or sorrow over vocalization endorsing our claims on happiness. The greatest
good to the greatest number of people; the greatest happiness as it decides
appropriate actions; while disputation is easy to correlate. We desire joys or
better happiness, where cherubs play our violins. Notwithstanding, an issue is
at hand, where in order to please the majority, we must alienate what is too
seen as another group labelled majority. We dismiss as disavowed those in their
dungeon. We never come to their aid, as dislodged creatures valuing a petit
segment its happiness. If one is damaged to ensure happiness for a bigger
group, we condone this as good actions. Around the corner, up the block, in a
rusty cave, we see something different. Consequences are posed as
inconsequential—where if actions must remain honest than consequences are not
priority—they are in fact, amelodic, as they have no color, they do not affect
the interior agent, what remains as true is, honesty, despite its tendency to
cause pain. A person will find philosophy endorsing his mentality inside rules
where reality is the philosophy. The philosophy is not judged, for it concerns
predisposition, insomuch as, a person needs to believe is his actions. One
might omit information, where unsaid information would dissuade a person, but
if he has determined it promotes better good over bad, then omission becomes a
necessary component to its functionality. We have arrived at an axiom. If one
might determine good by perspective, better than bad by actuality, one is
justified in his actions. We posit another axiom. An action is not determined
by a singular person, but rather, a group of trained inquisitors. This is
goodness. It is monitored. But independent qualification is an actual goal: to
become self-sufficient, to act as an autonomous person, to make approved
induction followed by deduction. We, nevertheless, fail to decode nor define a
legitimate, fail proof system to determine good actions aside from trained
intuition.
