Wednesday, June 15, 2022

Designed Against Intimacy

 

To address a person, needing satisfaction, left with a chasm; most deliberate, meant to create tension, some form of seductive torture.     I hope life is pure, free of dilution, free of dyes; most radiant, rectitude, forthcoming joys and raspberries.     If tales were told, what animal would you be? Each one holds implication.     I was with desire. I realized it was foreign in me.     To take self from itself.     You were pointing out the million-dollar worth in you.     That’s decent.     It is now an observation. It can’t be shared in totality. It was gifts acquired to compensate for gifts underdeveloped.     Up close, you are seen; further away, you are felt. What was the reason? It wasn’t for me. It was always for you. Something held a sacred space, and it was misused, for an infraction. The chaos was in you. It just needed an excuse. It should be at rest.     It isn’t.     Flattery sets off alarms. Exaggeration is dismissed. Underappreciation is insulting, and misinformed.     I will rest in not knowing you. I will exist in the caress of an aggressive petal.     The race is swift to the mark; you must increase.     What prevents the rescue, when one is in distress, pure displeasure, a refusal to reach, while it builds so high, we find things are as they were meant to exist, to persist.     Quite appeasing to the well-informed; such with eye-wings, to get into motion, where souls become vulnerable.     Kept at length, a mile long, rubies and terrors, another must intervene. We would be indebted.

 

It would be a lack of attraction—to look closer—and see the miracle; the gait made daily, the pages read and reread, the demanding world, the initiative you make. I never got on your good side, neither did I do greatly—as to get on that other side. At times, souls respect demarcation, instead of becoming a fleeting frenzy—I wasn’t designed to blurry you—while dreaming of blurring you, an ethical conundrum. The sickness of the person, to do right, lusting to do wrong, what’s worse—when one carries the desire? I am surprised at myself. Neither wanting the need of the immortal creature, nor wiping myself clean of the prosperity of spiritual legacy. The misused becomes the curious, the hurt soul becomes the one by dismissal. In hurting, two would get closer, never able to trust the alliance. In essence, it has overstayed its luxury—osmosis hath served its purpose, the remainder is mockery, derision, never with full appreciation.       

PS.

    The strength to withstand the winds; a spell as it effects/affects some creature. A sudden moment filled with absolute certainty, so wro...