Darkness
is that thing which frustrates holiness, often to
believer
recognizes a pattern; or vice a versa. We believe that darkness has been granted
permission to assail humanity; that which is found in the being of God has
permission to harass persons for holiness; where an unbeliever may search his
or her catalogue to render a more immediate locality for said affliction. So
that which is found in the person of God, is permitted a range of freedom. Why
is it not the case that God gives despite reciprocity? We believe that this is
actually the case: I first loved you;
moreover: Return to me, and I shall
return to you. So God freely gives to receive through reciprocation, where
we can never give to where a window of blessings shall not be opened up to pour
into us more than we can ever give. We find that darkness is more a monitor;
through which, we draw closer to the person of God, extracting secrets.
According to a lineage of holy persons, we first understand self, and this
leads us into a village of knowledge concerning God. If yin and yang hold truth,
we see a need for balance; that is, What
would a world of pure holiness look like? I imagine that the majority would
seek out the path of Jesus, where there is a great deal more in the person of
God to examine; of which, the crucifixion is the greatest knowledge. We find
that that found in God is a necessary component for our existence. This is not
an absolute statement; plus, riddled with holes; but upon belief, through
experience, one is want to say that darkness exists for it exists in the
Father, where unsaid affects are greater in us than in God. Let us speculate. I
push a pupil to get the best out of him. I grade him harshly. I tell him to wax on and wax off for several hours a
day. I challenge him with tasks that are a level higher than his natural
capacities; and he meets the challenges. Something is hereby revealed in his
person, a depth of insight and ability. It is similar with darkness: I permit
it to assail a person, but not up to the point of death. In this assailment,
the believer grows, discovering truths about self and God that could not be
obtained otherwise; for we go the deepest into ourselves during our struggles;
moreover, we experience this thing that God experiences necessarily. Where
gratuitousness is concerned, I have little that would benefit such an inquiry;
but I, here, argue that darkness is necessary, for it is a necessary element in God. Darkness is a form of balance, designed to draw believers into God, as
well as to open the eyes of non-believers. I leave us with this: Our thoughts
are not paralleled with the thoughts of God. This does not excuse what we may
find as unnecessary, for I haven’t spoken necessarily of evil; instead, I am
concerned with darkness; where evil entails darkness, but darkness does not
necessarily entail evil.
propel
holiness. The latter is quite illuminating; for it speaks
to
an operation; whereby, one is want to ask for the person
which
permits the function of this operation. Our thoughts
lead
us to believe that love is absent of frustration, or at
least
absent of gratuitous evil. We are a bit boxed in by
the
unnecessary; wherefore, we take recourse to speak of
the
unnecessary with reference to freewill. There are a
myriad
of answers; but here the focus is on darkness—the
tolerance
thereof; wherefore, we are with need to answer a
difficult
question: Why is darkness permitted to
assail
believers and
non-believers?
The non-believer may merely
suggest
that he or she is having a bad day; where the
